Kaizen Costing and Quality Academic Administration Services Case Study: Bureau of Academic Administration in Trilogy University 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v6i1.151Keywords:
Kaizen Costing, Effectiveness and EfficiencyAbstract
The purpose of this study is to explain the application of kaizen costing to the Academic Administration Bureau of the University of Trilogy. Kaizen costing is a concept that aims to reduce costs, strengthen brands, increase market share, increase information exchange within the company, increase profits, reduce capacity utilization, improve employee quality and productivity, and make gradual and continuous improvements to operational activities. Trilogy University Academic Administration Bureau was the object of research and involved employees of the Academic Administration Bureau and Trilogy University students from 2014 - 2019. This study used primary and secondary data. Primary data obtained through questionnaires and interviews, the preparation of the questionnaire considering the concept of 5S in kaizen costing namely Seiri, Seiton, Seiso, Seiketsu, Shitsuke. The results of this study indicate that based on respondents of the Trilogi University Academic Administration employee respondents suggest that only Seiketsu and Shitsuke affect quality of service of the Trilogy University Academic Administration Service. While the results based on student respondents indicate that Seiri, Seiton, Seiketsu, and Shitsuke affect the effectiveness and efficiency of the service of the Academic Administration Bureau of the University of Trilogy.References
Anzwar, S. (2001). Reliability and Validity. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Ghozali, I. (2015). Partial Least Square Concepts, Techniques, and Applications using the SmartPLS 3.0 program. Diponegoro University.
Imai, M. (2018). Gemba Kaizen A common sense, low-cost approach to management. Jakarta: PPM.
Kadarningsih, A. (2013). Competitive Advantage: Factors That Influence and Its Impact on Selling-In Performance. Media Economics & Information Technology, 1-18.
Kotler, Philip, & Keller, K. L. (2009). Marketing management volume 1, Thirteenth edition. Jakarta: Erlangga.
McDaniel, C., & Gates, R. (2013). Marketing Research. United States of America: John Willey & Sons, Inc.
McKinsey & Company. (2019). Automation and future of work in Indonesia. McKinsey.com.
Mulyati, D., & Darmawan, T. ((2013)). 5S Management Implementation in the CV. Rapi Vulcanizing Aceh Besar. Malikussaleh Industrial Engineering Journal Vol.2 No.2, 10-15.
Pamungkas, I., & Fransiska, R. (2018). Analysis of the Effect of Kaizen Culture on Employee Performance with Reward as a Moderation Variable in the Framework of Strengthening Business Competitiveness. Journal of Management Competitiveness.
Parasuraman. (2004). A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. Journal of Service Research, Vol 7, No. 5, 1-21.
Prakoso, S. B. (2015, January). Effectiveness of BPJS Health Services in Puskesmas Batang District. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 4 (1).
Rambat, L. (2004). Services Marketing Management: Theory and Practice. Jakarta: PT. Salemba 4.
Sahri, N. A., & Novita. (2019). Kaizen Costing as Continuous Improvement to Improve Competitive Advantage in E-Commerce. Accounting Studies, 3, 18-43.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Subawa, A. F. (2016, June). Application of Kaizen in Improving Product Efficiency and Quality in the Bury Tires of PT Bridgestone Tire Indonesia. Administrative Office, 4, No 1, 14-31.
Sugiyono (2012). Qualitative Quantitative Research Methods and R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supriyanto, A. (2014). Effect of 5S Working Attitudes (Seiri, Seiton, Seiso, Seiketsu, Shitsuke) on Work Productivity. Management and Accounting Research 5, 9.
Tjiptono, F. (2009). Service Marketing: Essence and Application. Yogyakarta: Marknesis.
Yohendry, Hapsara, O., & Surono, Y. (2017). Kaizen’s Implementation of PT. Dasa Anugerah Sejati Asian Agri Jambi. J-MAS, 196-205.