Preventing Local Government Fraud Through Supervision of Local Development Planning (Case Study on Supervision by X Province to Y Regency)

Jiwa Muhamad Satria Nusantara(1*), Irfan Ridwan Maksum(2),

(1) University of Indonesia
(2) University of Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Supervision from the Governor as the representative of the central government to the Regencies/cities below, becomes one of the factors in the consistency of development planning and budgeting, Sugiarto (2015). As a Regency with the highest growth rate in X Province, X Provinceshould pay attention to supervise local development planningin Y Regency to prevent Fraud. In fact, the role of the governor to supervise Y Regency still meet some obstacles. The analysis in this research is using the policy implementation model of Meter and Horn (1975), the supervision process by Griffin (2004) and the factors that influence the supervision of Tugiman (1996). Through a descriptive qualitative research approach, research analyses the implementation and the influencing factors of the implementation of the local development planning supervision policy of Y Regency by X Province. The results of the research show that policy implementation is not optimal and can be the starting point of fraud and corruption in local government. Some of the conditions that are not yet optimal in supervision include, dilemma in policy implementation, inaccurate determination of supervisory indicators, limitations in organizational structure, inappropriate monitoring budgeting mechanisms, and political bias between levels of government.Recommendations from this study include, government should to revise several regulations related to the role of the governor as the representative of the central government, revise indicators that related to local development planning supervision, work patterns that are not tied to organizational structures, preparation of SOPs and information systems that are used as tools for implementing supervision.

Keywords


Public Policy, Policy Implementation, Supervision, Fraud, Corruption, Local Development Planning, Local Government

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aziz, A. (2012). Analisis Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah dengan Pendekatan Sistem Lunak (Soft System) (Studi pada Rencana Kerja Pembangunan Daerah (LGWP) Kota Malang). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, Vol. 13 No. 2.

Budiarjo, Miriam. (2008). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Central Agency of Statistics X Province: X Province in Figures 2018.

Directorate General of Local Development of the Ministry of Home Affairs: Performance Report of the Directorate General of Local Development in 2017-2018.

Fikri, dkk. (2015). Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Dalam Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (Studi tentang Perencanaan Pembangunan Melalui Program Satu Miliyar Satu Kecamatan (SAMISAKE) di Kota Jambi). Jurnal Reformasi, 5.

Government Regulation Number 18 of 2016 concerning LocalDepartment.

Government Regulation Number 12 of 2017 concerning Guidance and Supervision of the Implementation of Local Government.

Griffin. (2004). Manajemen. Jakarta: AlihBahasa Gina Gania, Erlangga.

Grindle, Merilee S. 1980. Politics and Policy Implementation in The Third World. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. (1994). “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research,” dalam Norman K. Denzim and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research. California: Sage Publications.

Hiro, Tugiman. (1996). Pengenalan Internal Audit. PenerbitKanisius, Yogyakarta.

Hoessein, Bhenyamin, et al., dalam Laporan Penelitian Kajian Tata Hubungan Kewenangan antara Pemerintah dan Pemerintah Daerah, Kerjasama antara PKPADK-FISIP-UI dengan Kantor Menpan (2003).

Horwarth, Crowe. 2010. “IIA Practice Guide: Fraud and Internal Audit”. Anaheim, CA. Retrieved from http://aiba-us.org/wpcontent/uploads/2011/04/20100922AIBAFraud.pdf.

Indiahono, Dwiyanto. 2009. Kebijakan Publik Berbasis Dynamic Policy Analisys. Gava Media: Yogyakarta.

Law Number 25 of 2004 concerning the National Development Planning System.

Law Number 23 Year 2014 concerning Local Government.

LDPA X Province: LDPA Strategic PlanX Province 2013-2018.

LDPA X Province: LDPA Work PlanX Province Year 2016-2018.

LDPA X Province: LDPA Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (GAPAR) X Province Year 2016-2018.

Maksum, Irfan R. Pemerintahan Umum dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah. 28 Oktober 2016.

Meter, Donald Van, dan Carl Van Horn, 1975, The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework dalam Administration and Society 6, 1975, London: Sage.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. USA: Sage Publication.

Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 86 of 2017 concerning Procedures for Planning, Supervision and Evaluation of Local Development, Procedures for Evaluating Draft Local Regulations on Local Long-Term Development Plans and Local Medium-Term Development Plans, and Procedures for Changing Local Long-Term Development Plans, Development Plans Local Medium Term, and Local Government Work Plan.

Nitisastro, Widjojo. (2010). Pengalaman Pembangunan Indonesia: Kumpulan TulisandanUraianWidjojoNitisastro. Jakarta: Kompas.

Regency Government Y: Regency Y Local Middle-Term Development Plan (LMTDP) for 2012-2017.

Regency Government Y: Regency Y Regency Y Local Middle-Term Development Plan (LMTDP) 2017-2022.

Regency Government Y: Local Government Work Plan (LGWP) Y Regency 2016-2019.

Subandi. (2014). Ekonomi Pembangunan. Bandung: Alphabeta.

Sugiarto, Agus. (2015). Konsistensi Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah dengan Anggaran Daerah. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, Vol. 4 No. 1.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v6i1.191

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 144 times
PDF - 87 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Asia Pacific Fraud Journal (APFJ) Journal indexed in

 

Image result for ccbysa

Copyright @ 2016 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia Chapter