Social Control as Fraud Prevention Effort in State Audit Institutions

Suci Amelia Harlen(1*), Anggi Aulina Harahap(2),

(1) University of Indonesia
(2) University of Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Fraud is deviation by abusing work that results in losses for personal gain. The focus of this study is to analyze the relationship between social control and fraud prevention efforts at state audit institutions. The research method uses a literature study that is representative and relevant to the object of research. Auditors are vulnerable to fraudulent acts in their daily work, such as corruption, gratuities or regulatory authorities. The problem is how strong the auditor’s social control is in the form of internal and external self-defense so as not to fall into fraudulent actions. This study aims to expand the prevention of fraud on auditors with detention.

Keywords


Fraud; Containment Theory; Social Control Theory; Social Bond Theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


ACFE. (2019) Survei Fraud Indonesia. Jakarta: ACFE Indonesia Chapter.

Aldila, Yoga Aprianto. (2018) Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Integritas Anggota Satuan Lalu Lintas terhadap Kinerja Anggota Satuan Lalu Lintas dalam Penerapan E-Tilang di Wilayah Hukum Polres Tanggerang Selatan. Tesis, Universitas Indonesia.

Alvin A. And Loebbecke, James K. (2005) Auditing An Integrated Approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Ananda, I. (2014) Kemampuan Auditor dalam Pendeteksian Fraud (Studi Eksperimental). Tesis, Universitas Indonesia.

Bonger, W.A. (2015) Pengantar Tentang Kriminologi. Jakarta: Pustaka Sarjana.

Cardwell. S.M. (2013) Reckless Reevaluated: Containment Theory and Its Ability to Explain Desistance Among Serious Adolescent Offenders. Birmingham, Alabama.

Dermawan, M. Kemal. (2020) Teori Kriminologi. Banten: Universitas Terbuka.

Dewi, Ni Luh Putu Indah Trisna., dkk. (2018) ‘Fraud Triangle di Sektor Pemerintahan: Studi Kasus Pada Dinas Kabupaten Buleleng’, Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Humanika, 8(2).

Edi, Fauzi. (2013) Prospek Efektivitas Strategi Anti Fraud Bank Indonesia (2011) Sebagai Bentuk Pencegahan Kejahatan Perbankan (Suatu Penelitian Teknik Delphi Pendapat Para Pakar Perbankan). Tesis, Universitas Indonesia.

Firmansyah, M. J. (2018) Kasus Suap BPK Rochmadi Saptogiri Divonis 7 Tahun Penjara. Diakses dari: https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1066910/kasus-suap-bpkrochmadi-saptogiri-divonis-7-tahun-penjara.

Firmansyah., Sarwani., & Safrida, L. (2020) ‘Pengaruh Kompetensi, Objektivitas, Etika, Integritas, dan Time Budget Pressure terhadap Kualitas Pe-meriksaan pada BPK Perwakilan Kalimantan Timur’, Organum: Jurnal Saintifik Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 3(2), pp. 109-121. doi:https://doi.org/10.35138/organum.v3i2.112.

Hagan, Frank E. (2013) Pengantar Kriminologi: Teori, Metode, dan PerilakuKriminal. Jakarta: Kencana.

Hirschi, T. (2017) Causes of Delinquency. New York: Routledge.

Imran, dkk. (2007) Peraturan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia No.1Tahun 2007: Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara.

Indonesian Corruption Watch. (2018, September 19). Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi 2018 Semester I. Dipetik Agustus 2021, dari antikorupsi.org: https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/tren-penindakan-kasus-korupsi-2018-semester-i.

Juwianto, Joko. (2014). Integritas adalah Anda. Diakses dari: https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/5903/Integritas-adalah-Anda.html

Kennedy, Jay P. (2015) ‘Losing Control: A Test of Containment Theory and Ethical Decision Making’, International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 10.

Kompas.com. (2018). Auditor BPK Sigit Yugoharto Divonis 6 Tahun Penjara. Diakses dari: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/06/07/20481481/auditor-bpk-sigit-yugoharto-divonis-6-tahun-penjara

Kompas.com. (2018). Auditor BPK Ali Sadli Divonis 6 Tahun Penjara. Diakses dari: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/03/05/22443921/auditor-bpk-ali-sadli-divonis-6-tahun-penjara

Lanier, Mark M. dan Henry, S. (2010) Essential Criminology. Philadelphia: Westview Press.

L.I. (2020). Nilai Dasar BPK sebagai Landasan Pelaksanaan Tugas Para Pelaksana BPK. Diakses dari: https://www.bpk.go.id/news/nilai-dasar-bpk-sebagai-landasanpelaksanaan-tugas-para-pelaksana-bpk.

Marlinda, Putri. (2020) Kontrol Sosial oleh Perusahaan sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Praktik Pelanggaran Kode Etik Agen Asuransi Terhadap Nasabah. Tesis, Universitas Indonesia.

Meliala, A. (1993) Menyingkap Kejahatan Kerah Putih. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Mustofa, M. (2010) Kleptokrasi: Per-sekongkolan Birokrat-Korporat sebagai Pola White Collar Crime di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mustofa, Muhammad. (2013) Metode Penelitian Kriminologi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Onna, Joost HR Van and Denkers, Adrian J.M. (2018) Social Bonds and White-Collar Crime: A Two-Study Assessment of Informal Social Controls in White-Collar Offenders. Deviant Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2018.1472936.

Ondy. (2004) Tindak Kejahatan Korupsi (Studi Melalui Persepsi Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Instansi Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan). Tesis, Universitas Indonesia.

Reckless, W.C. (1973) The Crime Problem. New York: Meredith Corporation.

Saubani, Andri. (2021). Mantan Anggota BPK Rizal Djalil Divonis 4 Tahun Penjara. Diakses dari:https://www.republika.co.id/berita/qs5zsm409/mantan-anggota-bpk-rizal-djalil-divonis-4-tahun-penjara.

Singleton, Tommie W. & Singleton, Aaron J. (2010) Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. Canada: John Wiley & Sons.

Setiawan, W., Alfianto, N., & Kusumo, W.K. (2019) ‘Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya Fraud Di Sektor Pemerintaha Pada Dinas Kota Semarang’, Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 21 (1), pp 68-82.

Sims, Randy L. (2002) ‘Ethical Rule Breaking by Employees: A Test of Social Bonding Theory’, Jurnal of Business Ethics, 40, pp. 101-109.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v7i1.250

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 126 times
PDF - 101 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).