Construct Validity Test of Integrity and Suryomentaram-style Introspection in Creating Anti-Fraud

Authors

  • Mustika Prabaningrum Kusumawati Faculty of Law, Islamic University of Indonesia
  • Ari Nur Rahman Indonesia Eximbank (LPEI)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v8i1.274

Keywords:

Validity Test, Integrity, Introspection, Anti-Fraud

Abstract

The high level of corruption and fraud in Indonesia is one of the crucial problems that must be resolved immediately by the Government of Indonesia. Various efforts to eradicate corruption and the creation of anti-fraud will not be optimal if the habit of applying the meaning of integrity in actions and behavior, which begins with the determination of an employee or public official, is still mixed with the desire to enrich oneself and one’s class. The identification of the problem in this study includes 3 (two) things. First, does the construct of measuring instrument of integrity and Suryomentaram-style introspection supports the efforts to prevent fraud and corruption and fulfill unidimensionality by using confirmatory factor analysis? Second, does the measuring instrument of integrity and Suryomentaram-style introspection in this study consists of items that fit in measuring integrity and Suryomentaram-style introspection using the application of the polytomous IRT model? Third, do the items in the measuring instrument of integrity and Suryomentaram-style introspection in this study contain a response bias based on gender that can be detected through differential item functioning (DIF)?. This research was conducted with the aim of obtaining measuring instrument of integrity and Suryomentaram-style introspection that supports steps to prevent fraud and corruption at the level of implementing employees to managers in Indonesian companies and/or state institutions.

References

Adams, R.J., & Khoo, S.-T. (1994). ACER Quest the interactive test analysis system (p. Version 2.1. 104).

Baker, F. B. (2001). The Basics of Item Response Theory.

Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Wiemann, S. (2007). A Review of Recent Developments in Integrity Test Research. Personnel Psychology, 60(2), 271–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00074.x.

Blasi, A. (2004). Moral Functioning: Moral Unterstanding and Personality. D.K. Lapsey & D. Narvaez.

Falani, I., Akbar, M., & Naga, D. S. (2020). Comparison of the Accuracy of Item Response Theory Models in Estimating Student ’ s Ability. Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 6(2), 178–184.

Freidenberg, J. (2011). Researching Global Spaces Ethnographically: Queries on Methods for the Study of Virtual Populations. Human Organization, 70(3), 265–278.

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory Library.

Hariyani, E., Zirman, Z., & Ramadhany, F. (2015). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Independensi, Skeptisme Profesi-onal, Kompetensi, dan Komunikasi Interpersonal Auditor Kap terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan (Studi Empiris pada Kap di Wilayah Pekanbaru, Medan, dan Batam). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau, 2(2).

Hurt, S., & Tomoyasu, N. (1995). Psychological Testing and Assessment. Guidebook for Clinical Psychology Interns.

Kemenkes RI. (2019). Panduan Orientasi Kader Posyandu. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Kholik, A., & Himam, F. (2015). Konsep Psikoterapi Kawruh Jiwa Ki Ageng Suryomentaram. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology, 1(2).

Killinger, B. (2010). Integrity Doing the Right Thing for the Right Reason.

Menteri Kesehatan. (2019). PerMenKes Nomor 8. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Bidang Kesehatan, Nomor 65(879), 2004–2006.

Munif, A. (2017). Studi Komparasi Konsep tentang Diri Ki Ageng Suryomentaram dan Muhammad Iqbal. Skripsi. Fakultas Ushuluddin Dan Humaniora Universitas Islam Negri Walisongo.

Nawawi, A. M., Hannase, M., & Safei, A. (2019). Tasawuf Qurani Jawi Ki Ageng Suryomentaram Studi Kawruh Jiwa. Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Keislaman, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.36671/mumtaz.v2i2.24.

Nilam, W. (2008). Kawruh Jiwa Suryo-mentaram: Konsep Emik atau Etik?. Journal Buletin Psikologi, 18, 46–57.

Ones, D. S. (1993). Establishing Construct Validity for Integrity Tests. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (2003). Personality and Absenteeism: A Meta-Analysis of Integrity Tests. European Journal of Personality, 17(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.487.

Permatasari, M. (2012). Pengaruh Gaya Berpikir, Integritas dan Usia pada Perilaku Kerja yang Kontraproduktif. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 1, 75–88.

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification.

Pratisti, D. W., & Prihartanti, N. (2012). Konsep Mawas Diri Suryomentaram dengan Regulasi Emosi. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 13(1), 16–29.

Putri, D. A., & Nihayah, Z. (2019). The Effect of Moral Integrity, Lifestyle and Organizational Culture on Anti-Corruption Intention. TAZKIYA: Journal of Psychology, 5(2), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.15408/tazkiya.v22i2.8413.

Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. B o s t o N : Houghton Mifflin., 1961.

Rosmi, R., & Syamsir, S. (2020). The Importance of Integrity Values as Corruption Prevention Measures. Test Engineering & Management, 83(1), 12043–12054.

Schlenker, B. R., Miller, M. L., & Johnson, R. M. (2017). Moral Identity , Integrity, and Personal Responsibility. European Journal of Personality (EJP), 25, 2–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627125.015.

Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Compe-titiveness Report 2019. World Economic Forum.

Sumedi, D. (2012). Tahap-tahap pendidikan karakter dalam pemikiran Ki Ageng Suryomentaram dan relevansinya dengan pendidikan akhlak Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2012.12.183-201.

Transparency International. (2019). Corruption Perceptions Index 2019.

Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020.

Transparency International Indonesia. (2014). Indonesia Bersih Uang Pelicin. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 1(Indonesia Bersih Uang Pelicin).

Wahyuningrum, K. &. (2017). Aktualisasi Ajaran Ki Ageng Suryomentaram Sebagai Basis Pendidikan Karakter, Journal Pancar, 1, 1–12.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Kusumawati, M. P., & Rahman, A. N. (2023). Construct Validity Test of Integrity and Suryomentaram-style Introspection in Creating Anti-Fraud. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 8(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v8i1.274

Most read articles by the same author(s)