ENGAGING PEOPLE, ENABLING TECHNOLOGY: CITIZEN’S PERSPECTIVES ON ANTI FRAUD MEASURESIN THE INDONESIAN PUBLIC SERVICES SECTOR
(1) PT. Pertamina Hulu Mahakam
(2) PT. Pertamina Hulu Mahakam
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ACFE, Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse, retrieved fromhttp://www.acfe.com/
Albrecht,W.,et.al.,(2012)., Fraud Examination., Connecticut: Cengage Learning.
Ali, a. &Isse, H.S. (2003). Determinants of Economic Corruption: a cross-country comparison [Electronic Version], Cato Journal, 22, (3), 449-467.
Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M., (2014). Indignation or resignation: the implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2),291-320.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M., (2010). Bertot, John C., Paul T. Jaeger, and Justin
M. Grimes., Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies, Government information quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.
Bologna, G Jack, Joseph T Wells., Robert J Lindquist., (1994), The Accountant's Handbook of Fraud and Commercial Crime, Published December 22nd 1992 by Wiley.
Coulibaly, Siaka, 2004, Citizen participation, good governance and sustainable development: The conditions of the social sustainability of development actions).
Davies, T., &Fumega, S., (2014), Mixed incentives: Adopting ICT innovations for Transparency, Accountability, and Anti-Corruption. Bergen: U4 Anti-Corruption Research Centre.
Deloitte, (2018), India Corporate Fraud Perception Survey.
Elbahnasawy, N. G., (2014), Egovernment, internet adoption, and corruption: an empirical investigation. World Development, 57, 114-126.
Fox, J., (2007), The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in practice, 17(4-5), 663-671.
GIZ, (2017), EmbracingDigitalisation: How to use ICT to strengthen Anti-Corruption Retrieved April 10, 2019, from Deutsche GesellschaftfürinternationaleZusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
Gurin, J., (2014), Open governments, open data: A new lever for transparency, citizen engagement, and economic growth. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 34(1), 71-82.
Heald, D., (2006), Varieties of transparency. Proceedings of the British Academy, 135, 25-43.
Hill, C., (2009), International Business: Competing in the global marketplace. 7th edition, The McGraw-Hill companies, New York.
Kevin B. Wright., (2005)., Researching Internet-Based Populations, Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, Volume 10, Issue 3, 1 April 2005, JCMC1034.
Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H., (2009), An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42-50.
Kossow, N., &Kukutschka, R. M., (2017), Civil society and online connectivity: controlling corruption on the net? Crime, Law, and Social Change, 1-18.
Misuraca, Gianluca, 2007, E-governance in Africa: From theory to action, a Handbook on ICTs for Local Governance 2007.
Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. The electronic journal of information systems in developing countries, 18.
OLAF-European Anti-Fraud Office, (2009), Deterring Fraud by Informing the Public, 3rd ed., Luxembourg.
Salamon, L. M/Sokolowski, S. W/List, R., (2003), Global Civil Society. An Overview, Baltimore.
Soeharto, Indra; Nugroho, Nugroho, (2017), Are We Culturally Corrupt? Revisiting the Relationship between Cultural Dimensions and Corruption Perception Index. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 143-149, feb. 2018.
Starke, C., Naab, T. K., & Scherer, H., (2016), Free to Expose Corruption: The Impact of Media Freedom, Internet Access and Governmental Online Service Delivery on Corruption. International Journal of Communication, 4702-4722.
Sturges, P., (2004), Corruption, Transparency and a Role for ICT? International Journal of Information Ethics, 2(11), 1-9.
Transparency International – Corruption Perception Index., (2012-2018), retrieved from http://transparency.org.
United Nations, (2005), Compendium of Innovative E-Government Practices. New York, NY: United Nations.
Wallace, C/Pichler, F., (2009), More Participation, Happier Society? A Comparative Study of Civil Society and the Quality of Life, Social Indicators Research, 93, 2, 255-274.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v5i1.131
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 373 timesPDF - 276 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).