Indra Soeharto(1*), Heri Kurniadi Sugiyo Pranoto(2),

(1) PT. Pertamina Hulu Mahakam
(2) PT. Pertamina Hulu Mahakam
(*) Corresponding Author


This research aims to synthesise citizen’s perspectives on anti fraud measures that are currently implemented in the Indonesian public services sector. In this sector, various measures to eradicate fraud/corruption have been initiated by the government despite the fact that such practices are still apparent. Two research questions were proposed; first, what are Indonesian citizens’ perspectives on the anti fraud/corruption efforts implemented by the government, in the Indonesian public services sector during the last three years? Second, according to their perspective, which approach on anti fraud/corruption measure that is considered as the most effective way to eradicate fraud and corruption?. Using questionnaires, the research collect responses from 188 respondents – Indonesian citizen older than 21 years old - in 5 cities in Indonesia. The respondents perceive that despite of its low improvement on corruption level, as reflected by the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) score, the anti fraud/anti corruption measures implemented in the Indonesian public service sector are well progressing. The research also reveals that despite of currently low public participation in anti fraud/anti corruption measures, three factors i.e. consistent law enforcement, engaging public participation and implementing information and communication technology (ICT) are perceived as the most effective measures in anti fraud/anti corruption effort. Understanding the importance of those avenues will provide imperative emphasis in designing, formulating and evaluating anti fraud/anti corruption measures, particularly in the Indonesian public services sector. This will in turn provide necessary support for the government to achieve a positive and sustainable economic growth.


Fraud, Public Participation, Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

Full Text:



ACFE, Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse, retrieved fromhttp://www.acfe.com/

Albrecht,W.,et.al.,(2012)., Fraud Examination., Connecticut: Cengage Learning.

Ali, a. &Isse, H.S. (2003). Determinants of Economic Corruption: a cross-country comparison [Electronic Version], Cato Journal, 22, (3), 449-467.

Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M., (2014). Indignation or resignation: the implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2),291-320.

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M., (2010). Bertot, John C., Paul T. Jaeger, and Justin

M. Grimes., Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies, Government information quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.

Bologna, G Jack, Joseph T Wells., Robert J Lindquist., (1994), The Accountant's Handbook of Fraud and Commercial Crime, Published December 22nd 1992 by Wiley.

Coulibaly, Siaka, 2004, Citizen participation, good governance and sustainable development: The conditions of the social sustainability of development actions).

Davies, T., &Fumega, S., (2014), Mixed incentives: Adopting ICT innovations for Transparency, Accountability, and Anti-Corruption. Bergen: U4 Anti-Corruption Research Centre.

Deloitte, (2018), India Corporate Fraud Perception Survey.

Elbahnasawy, N. G., (2014), Egovernment, internet adoption, and corruption: an empirical investigation. World Development, 57, 114-126.

Fox, J., (2007), The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in practice, 17(4-5), 663-671.

GIZ, (2017), EmbracingDigitalisation: How to use ICT to strengthen Anti-Corruption Retrieved April 10, 2019, from Deutsche GesellschaftfürinternationaleZusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.

Gurin, J., (2014), Open governments, open data: A new lever for transparency, citizen engagement, and economic growth. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 34(1), 71-82.

Heald, D., (2006), Varieties of transparency. Proceedings of the British Academy, 135, 25-43.

Hill, C., (2009), International Business: Competing in the global marketplace. 7th edition, The McGraw-Hill companies, New York.

Kevin B. Wright., (2005)., Researching Internet-Based Populations, Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, Volume 10, Issue 3, 1 April 2005, JCMC1034.

Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H., (2009), An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42-50.

Kossow, N., &Kukutschka, R. M., (2017), Civil society and online connectivity: controlling corruption on the net? Crime, Law, and Social Change, 1-18.

Misuraca, Gianluca, 2007, E-governance in Africa: From theory to action, a Handbook on ICTs for Local Governance 2007.

Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. The electronic journal of information systems in developing countries, 18.

OLAF-European Anti-Fraud Office, (2009), Deterring Fraud by Informing the Public, 3rd ed., Luxembourg.

Salamon, L. M/Sokolowski, S. W/List, R., (2003), Global Civil Society. An Overview, Baltimore.

Soeharto, Indra; Nugroho, Nugroho, (2017), Are We Culturally Corrupt? Revisiting the Relationship between Cultural Dimensions and Corruption Perception Index. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 143-149, feb. 2018.

Starke, C., Naab, T. K., & Scherer, H., (2016), Free to Expose Corruption: The Impact of Media Freedom, Internet Access and Governmental Online Service Delivery on Corruption. International Journal of Communication, 4702-4722.

Sturges, P., (2004), Corruption, Transparency and a Role for ICT? International Journal of Information Ethics, 2(11), 1-9.

Transparency International – Corruption Perception Index., (2012-2018), retrieved from http://transparency.org.

United Nations, (2005), Compendium of Innovative E-Government Practices. New York, NY: United Nations.

Wallace, C/Pichler, F., (2009), More Participation, Happier Society? A Comparative Study of Civil Society and the Quality of Life, Social Indicators Research, 93, 2, 255-274.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v5i1.131

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 387 times
PDF - 292 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).