AN EFFECTIVE ANTI-FRAUD PROGRAM: HOW DO WE KNOW? (THE CHALLENGE OF FINDING AN ANTI-FRAUD PROGRAM IN THE INDONESIAN PUBLIC SECTORS) | Eryanto | Asia Pacific Fraud Journal

Font Size

Keywords Cashless Basis, Corruption, Government Credit Card, Public Sector Innovation Competence, Independence, Audit Quality Corruption Corruption, Business Integrity Perception, Corruption Potential Perception, Local Integrity System, Public Integrity Perception Culture Fee, Motivation, Eradication of Corruption, KPK Performance Financial Shenanigans, F-score Model, Financial Report Fraud Detection, Indonesia and Malaysia Fraud Fraud Risk Fraudulent financial reporting Good Governance Indonesia Integrity Javanese Culture Leadership, GCG, Culture, Anti-Fraud Local Wisdom Public Sector Whistleblowing Intention, Religiosity, Fraud Tendency, Higher Education Whistleblowing, Type of Leadership, Accountability Pressure fraud risk management design, fraud, hotel fraud, whistleblowing, management of student fund

About The Author

Dedy Eryanto
Wellington School of Business and Government, Victoria University of Wellington
New Zealand

Accreditation

Template

Statistik Jurnal

Google Scholar Counter

User

Open Journal Systems

Notifications

Journal Content
Browse

Tools

Visitor

View Apf Journal

Article Tools

Print this article

Indexing metadata

How to cite item

Email this article (Login required)

Email the author (Login required)

Download this PDF file

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 66261 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).