Relevance of Good Corporate Governance Towards the Principle of Business Judgement Rule for State-owned Enterprises’ Corruption Cases: A Legal Perspective

Leonardi Ryan Andika(1*), Nethania Vanida(2), Jocelyn Aprilia(3), Monica Gracia Irjanto(4),

(1) Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


Business judgement rule is often used as one of the principles to determine whether a corporate actor is evidently guilty in various corruption cases. Thus, this study aims to explain the relevance of corporate governance implementation as an additional objective measurement towards the business judgement rule principle in state-owned enterprises corruption cases. Through the juridical-normative approach and qualitative method analysis, it is found that in the middle of ambiguous positions of state-owned corporations in Indonesia, corporate governance must be taken into account in determining the court ruling especially in many corruption cases as a tool to minimize the legal uncertainty. This study also found that the corporate governance standard is able to convince the public in various financial decisions as a parallel example.


Business Judgement Rule, Corporate Governance, State-owned Enterprise, Corruption

Full Text:



Akbar, M. (2016). Business Judgement Rule Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Direksi Perseroan Dalam Melakukan Transaksi Bisnis. Justisi Ilmu Hukum Journal 1(1):1-15.

Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 1984 Del. LEXIS 305 (Del. Mar. 1, 1984).

Berle, A. Means, C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.

Balotti, R. Franklin and Hanks, J. James. Rejudging the Business Judgment Rule. The Business Lawyer 48(4): 1337-1353.

Bhandari, Arabinda. (2018). Strategic Management: A Conceptual Framework. New York: McGraw Hill Education.

Cahyaningtyas, A.R. and Hadiprajitno, B. (2015). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Perception Index dan Profitabilitas Perusahaan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Diponegoro Journal Accounting, 4(3): 556-567.

Chakham, Jonathan. (1994). Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries. Oxford: Claredan Press.

Coudert, Frederic R. (1905). Certainty and Justice. The Yale Law Journal 14 (7): 361-373.

Fahlevi, M. and Juhandi, N. (2019). ‘The Impact of CGPI Award towards Financial Performance of LQ45 Firms’. In The 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Business in The Changing World.

Fuady, Munir. (2003). Perseroan Terbatas Paradigma Baru. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Furlow, Clark W. (2009). Good Faith, Fiduciary Duties, and the Business Judgement Rule in Delaware. Utah Law Review : 1063-1095.

Griffith, Sean J. (2005). Good Faith Business Judgement: A Theory of Rhetoric in Corporate Law Jurisprudence. Duke Law Journal 55 (1):1-73.

Hamzah, Andi. (2005). Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Court Ruling No. 1513 K/Pid.Sus/2012.

Indonesia Corruption Eradication Commision. (2017). Study on the Implementation of Good Corporate Governance in Private Entities, State-Owned Enterprises and Regional-Owned Enterprises. Jakarta: Indonesia CEC.

Jhandir, S.U., (2012). Relationship between Corporate Governance score and stock prices: Evidence from KSE-30 index companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(4):239-249.

Jungmann, C. (2006). The effectiveness of corporate governance in one-tier and two-tier board systems–Evidence from the UK and Germany–. European Company and Financial Law Review 3(4): 426-474.

K. Gopal. (1998). Emerging Trends in Corporate Governance. Indian Management Journal (5): 12.

Kasim, Helmi. (2017). Memikirkan Kembali Pengawasan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Berdasarkan Business Judgement Rules. Jurnal Konstitusi 14 (2): 440-462.

Lamintang P.A.F and Lamintang. T. Fransiscus. (2016). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Mohamed, W.S. and Elewa, M.M., (2016). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Stock Price and Trade Volume. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 6(2): 27-44.

Neri-Castratane, Giulia. (2015). Corporate Governance from a Comparative Perspective: Does the Business Judgement Rule Promote Corporate Social Responsibility?. Frontiers of Law in China 10 (1): 9-21.

Novelino, Andry. (2020). ‘Eks Dirut Pertamina Karen Agustiawan Divonis Lepas MA’, CNN Indonesia, 09 March. Available at: (Accessed: 25th July 2020).

Nowicki, Elizabeth A. (2007). Not In Good Faith. SMU Law Review 60(2):1-53.

OECD (2015), G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Pertiwi, Hana and C. Sitompul. (2013). ‘Prinsip Business Judgment Rules Terhadap Unsur Melawan Hukum Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus: Putusan 36/Pid.B/TPK/2013/PN.JKT.PST Dengan Terdakwa Hotasi Nababan Mantan Direktur PT Merpati Nusantara Airlines)’. Undergraduate Thesis. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.

Ponsford, P. Matthew. (2016). Corporate Governance and the Business Judgment Rule: Fiduciary Duties of Directors in Canada and the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences 5 (1):1-4.

Prasinta, D. (2012). Pengaruh CG Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Accounting Analysis Journal 1(2).

Prastika, Yurice Prastika. (2020). Efektivitas Penerapan Good Corporate Governance (CG) dalam Upaya Pencegahaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di PT Kereta Api Indonesia. Jurnal Idea Hukum 6 (1): 96-112.

Prasetyo, Adi. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Direksi terkait Business Judgement Rule (Analisis Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi No. 1513 K/Pid.Sus/2012 atas nama terpidana Umar Zen). MaPPI FHUI: 117-142.

Roberts, J., (2005). Agency theory, ethics and corporate governance. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 11: 249-269.

South Jakarta District Court Ruling 36/Pid.B/TPK/2013/PN.JKT.PST

Stanwick, A. Peter and Stanwick, D. Sarah. (2002). The Relationship between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance: An Empirical Study. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship (8):35-48.

Stone v. Ritter, 911 A.2d 362, 2006 Del. LEXIS 597 (Del. Nov. 6, 2006).

Supreme Court of Indonesia Ruling No. 130/PK/Pid.Sus/2013 (Extraordinary Appeal).

Supreme Court of Indonesia Ruling No. 861 K/Pid.Sus/2015.

Taher, Andrian. (2020). ‘MA Vonis Bebas eks Dirut Pertamina Karen Agustiawan’,, 10 March [Online]. Available at: (Accessed: 25th July 2020).

Unsecured Creditors of Integrated Health Services, Inc. v. Elkins, C.A. No. 20228-NC, 2004 Del. Ch. LEXIS 122 (Del. Ch. Aug. 24, 2004).

Varzaly, Jennifer. (2012). Protecting the Authority of Directors: An Empirical Analysis of the Statutory Business Judgment Rule. Journal of Corporate Law Studies 12 (2) : 429-463.

Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation, 825 A.2d 275 (Del. Ch. 2003).


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 328 times
PDF - 193 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).