Implementation of Regulatory and Supervisory Policy Authority in the Establishment of Internal SOP Against Credit Fraud in Indonesian Banking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v6i2.221Keywords:
Policy, Control, Fraud, CreditAbstract
Banking is one of the drivers and centers of a country's economy. Based on the authority they have, it is not surprising that the risk held by banks is very high. Therefore, banking is one of the business sectors that have very strict supervision. This paper discusses how the implementation of regulatory policy authorities applicable in Indonesia related to the establishment of internal banking Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in minimizing the potential for credit fraud and how internal and external supervisory authorities can become benchmarks in supporting the creation of anti-fraud policies, especially in credit fraud. There are two main factors that can create a potential credit fraud chain that leads to financial statement fraud: first, delays in updating regulatory policies; and second, ineffective and insensitive internal and external banking supervision. In addition, there needs to be a certain regulatory policy that deals with credit fraud, whether issued by the government, Bank Indonesia, OJK or internal Banking SOP itself.References
Anderson, C., &Galinsky, A. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology: Special Issue on Social Power 36: 511–536.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia Chapter dan E&Y. (2017). Survai Fraud Indonesia, ACFE Indonesia Chapter.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2016). Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Global Fraud Study.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2019). International Fraud Examiners Manual.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2020). Report to the Nations. Global Fraud Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse.
Bansai. (2019). Identifying the Measures for Fraud Detection Specifically Loan & Advance Related Fraud in the Banking Sector of India. Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education. Vol. 6 No. 5.
Coram & Ferguson. (2014). The Importance of Internal Audit in Fraud Detection.
Denzin and Lincoln (2011). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
Erni & Saefullah. (2005). Pengantar Manajemen. Prenada Media. Jakarta.
Granger &Newbold. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics. Vol. 2. No. 2: 111–120.
Ismail. (2010). Manajemen Perbankan. Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Kencana.
Kasmir (2014). Dasar-dasar Perbankan. Edisi Revisi, Cetakan keduabelas, Penerbit: Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and Inhibition. Psychological Review 110: 265–284.
Kipnis, D. (1972). Does power corrupt? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 33–41.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHP). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981.
KitabUndang-UndangHukumPerdata (KUHPerdata). (1847). BurgerlijkWetboekvoorIndonesie.
KPMG. (2015). Framework for Loan Fraud.
Leo Agustino. (2012). Dasar-dasar Kebijakan Publik. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Meliana& Hartono. (2019). Fraud Perbankan Indonesia: Studi Eksplorasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional ke 2. Buku 2: Sosial dan Humaniora.
Peraturan bank Indonesia Nomor 14/22/PBI/2012 tentang Pemberian Kredit atau Pembiayaan oleh Bank Umum dan Bantuan Teknis dalam Rangka Pengembangan Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 39/POJK.03/2019 tentang Penerapan Stategi Anti Fraud.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 40/POJK.03/2019 tentang Penilaian Kualitas Aset Bank Umum.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 6/POJK.03/2016 Jo. Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 14/26/PBI/2012 tentang Kegiatan Usaha dan Jaringan Kantor Berdasarkan Modal Inti Bank.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor POJK No. 12/POJK.03/2016 Jo. Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 8/26/PBI/2006 tentang Kegiatan Usaha dan Jaringan Kantor BPR Berdasarkan Modal Inti.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 35 Tahun 2017 Jo. PP No. 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Penghapusan Piutang Negara/Daerah.
Reeves et. all. (2013). Ethnography in Qualitative Educational Research: AMEE Guide No. 80.
Said ZainalAbidin. (2012). KebijakanPublik (edisi 2). SalembaHumanika. Jakarta
Singh et. all. (2016). Frauds in the Indian Banking Industry. Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. Working Papper No: 55.
Spilackova. (2012). Historical Research in Social Work - Theory and Practice. ERIS Web Journal. Vol. 3. No. 2.
Subardi. (1992). Dasar-dasar Manajemen. Bagian Penerbitan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN. Yogyakarta
Toland & Yoong. (2011). An Exploration of Historical Methods for Information Systems Research.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1995 Jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Jo. Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang –Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 49 Tahun 1960 tentang Panitia Urusan Piutang Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2016 tentang Pencegahan dan Penanganan Krisis Sistem Keuangan.
Vredenburgh & Brender. (1998). The Hierarchical Abuse of Power in Work Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 1337 - 1347.
Wang & Sun. (2016). Absolute Power Leads to Absolute Corruption? Impact of Power on Corruption Depending on the Concepts of Power One Holds. European Journal of social Psychology 46: 77 - 89.
