Determinants of Budgets Fraud for Handling COVID-19 in Makassar City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v8i2.300Keywords:
Fraud, Budget, Crowe’s fraud pentagon, Bureaucratic Reform.Abstract
This study aims to examine the determinants of budget fraud for handling COVID-19 in the city of Makassar. This study uses a survey method for data collection. The samples of this research are 171 employees who work in Local Government Organizations in Makassar City while the data analysis tool uses SMART PLS software.The results of this study indicate that the greater the pressure, opportunity, competence, and arrogance of a person, the greater the level of fraud that occurs in a country. However, different results were found on the rationalization variable that fraud that occurred in a country was not influenced by a person’s rationalization in justifying his actions. Moderation in this study shows that bureaucratic reform can weaken the relationship between pressure and opportunity for fraud. However, it strengthens the connection between justification, competence, and arrogance to the occurrence of fraudReferences
Abdillah, W., & Hartono, J. (2015). Partial Least Square: Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis. ANDI.
Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2018). Fraud Prevention Initiatives in the Nigerian Public Sector: Understanding the Relationship of Fraud Incidences and The Elements of Fraud Triangle Theory. Journal of Financial Crime. www.emeraldinsight.com
ACFE (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners) Indonesia Chapter. (2020). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. Acfe. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Akny, A. B. (2014). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Reformasi Birokrasi di Bidang SDM Aparatur untuk Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Pegawai. Jurnal Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 6(1), 416–427.
Aprilia, A. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 101-111. 10.17509/jaset.v9i1.5259.
Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(2), 154–165. 10.15294/jda.v7i1.4036.
Arisandi, D., & Verawaty. (2017). Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Keuangan dan Perbankan di Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Global Competitive Advantage, 3(3), 312–323.
Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons. 10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.441.
Christian, N., Basri, Y. Z., & Arafah, W. (2019). Analysis Of Fraud Pentagon To Detecting Corporate Fraud In Indonesia. International Journal Of Economics, Business and Management Reasearch, 3(8), 1–13.
Cressey, D. R. (1950). The Criminal Violation of Financial Trust. American Sociological Association, 15(6), 738–743.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Dorminey, J., Scott Fleming, A., Kranacher, M. J., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. American Accounting Association, 27(2), 555–579. 10.2308/iace-50131.
Farber, D. B. (2005). Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? Accounting Review, 80(2), 539–561. 10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.539.
Fitri, F., & Nadirsyah, N. (2019). Pengaruh Tekanan (Pressure), Kesempatan (Opportunity), Rasionalisasi (Rationalization), Dan Kapabilitas (Capability) Terhadap Kecurangan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Di Pemerintahan Aceh Dengan Pemoderasi Budaya Etis Organisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 4(3), 412–427. 10.24815/jimeka.v4i3.12575.
Fowler, F. . (2009). Survey research methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Harto, C. T. & P. (2016). Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon pada Sektor Ke-uangan dan Perbankan di Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi.
Horwath, C. (2011). Why the Fraud Triangle is No Longer Enough. Www.Crowe.Com.
Huang, S. Y., Lin, C. C., Chiu, A. A., & Yen, D. C. (2017). Fraud detection using fraud triangle risk factors. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(6), 1343–1356. 10.1007/s10796-016-9647-9.
Irawati, E., Kristiana, A., & Niki, M. A. (2019). Strategies For Deregulation And National Policy Making Improvement. Jurnal Analis Kebijakan, 3(1).
Irianto, G., & Novianti, N. (2018). Dealing with Fraud. UB Press.
Kassem, R., & Higson, A. (2012). The New Fraud Triangle Model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences (JETEMS), 3(3), 191–195.
Marliani, M., & Jogi, Y. (2015). Persepsi Pengaruh Fraud Triangle Terhadap Pencurian Kas. Journal Business Accounting Review.
Mock, T. J. (2014). An Analysis of the Fraud Triangle An Analysis of the Fraud Triangle Incentive / Pressure. May.
Moyes, G., Lin, P., & Landry, R. (2005). Raise the red flag. Internal Auditor.
Nindito, M. (2018). Financial statement fraud: Perspective of the Pentagon Fraud model in Indonesia. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(3), 1–9.
Othman, R., Aris, N. A., Mardziyah, A., Zainan, N., & Amin, N. M. (2015). Fraud Detection and Prevention Methods in the Malaysian Public Sector: Accountants’ and Internal Auditors’ Perceptions. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28(April), 59–67. 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01082-5.
Pane, A. A. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Pemerintah terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan. JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN BISNIS : Jurnal Program Studi Akuntansi, 4(2), 40. 10.31289/jab.v4i2.1812.
Prasojo, E., & Kurniawan, T. (2008). Reformasi Birokrasi dan Good Governance: Kasus Best Practices dari Sejumlah Daerah di Indonesia. Symposium A Quarterly Journal In Modern Foreign Literatures, 1–15.
Purwanto, E., Mulyadi, J., & Anwar, C. (2017). Kajian Konsep Diamond Fraud Theory Dalam Menunjang Efektivitas Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Di Pemerintah Kota Bogor. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 17(3), 149-159. 10.25124/jmi.v17i3.1153
Rezaee, Z. (2005). Causes, consequences, and deterence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00072-8.
Siddiq, R., Achyani, F., & Zulfikar. (2017). Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement. Seminar Nasional Dan the 4Th Call Syariah Paper.
Sihombing, M., & Budiartha, I. K. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Triangle Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Academic Fraud ) Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. E-Jurnal Akuntansi. 10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i02.p07
Susandra, F., & Hartina, S. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Fraud Pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (Skpd) Di Kota Bogor. Jurnal Akunida. 10.30997/jakd.v3i2.987
Tiffani, L. dan M. (2009). Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Analisis Fraud Triangel pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(2), 112–125.
Ulfah, M., Nuraina, E., & Wijaya, A. L. (2017). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris pada Perbankan di Indonesia yang Terdaftar di BEI). Forum Ilmiah Pendidikan Akuntansi, 5(2), 399–417.
Wahyuni, P. M., & Siswandaru. (2019). Reformasi Birokrasi Sebagai Pendorong Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. JURNAL PEKAN : Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 4(1), 17–35. 10.31932/jpk.v4i1.373.
Wilks, T. J., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2004). Decomposition of fraud-risk assessments and auditors’ sensitivity to fraud cues. In Contemporary Accounting Research. 10.1506/HGXP-4DBH-59D1-3FHJ.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
