Collusion Fraud Risk Mitigation with Integration of Data Analytics in E-Tendering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v8i1.301Keywords:
Tender Collusion Risk, Control, Data AnalyticsAbstract
There are already mandates and recommendations for detecting indications of tender collusion, but the risk of collusion in e-tendering has not been handled properly. Meanwhile, data analytics competency has become a prerequisite for successful digital transformation. This study aims to reveal the projection of data analytics integration in controlling collusion risk in e-tendering. This study uses a quantitative research method. The object of this study includes data on the risk of tender collusion and the KPPU’s Decisions for 2021 and 2022. The results of this study reveal that the average similarity of bids is 0.5308, a parameter indicating the risk of collusion in tenders. Existing controls have not been effective in dealing with this risk. Control development can be designed by referring to KPPU regulations and recommendations to LKPP. Maximum control standards can be applied by developing preventive controls in the form of data analytics competence training for the Selection Committee so that they are able to detect indications of collusion in tenders. In addition, data analytics tools need to be integrated into e-tendering in the Electronic Procurement System (SPSE).References
Andriana, G. (2021). Penerapan E-Procure-ment Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah terhadap Identifikasi Persekongkolan Tender. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 5.
Anindyajati, T. (2018). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 85/PUU-XIV/2016 terhadap Praktek Persekongkolan Tender. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1527
Anysz, H., Foremny, A., & Kulejewski, J. (2019). Comparison of ANN Classifier to the Neuro-Fuzzy System for Collusion Detection in the Tender Procedures of Road Construction Sector. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(11). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/11/112064
Arfanti, M. A. C. (2014). Pelaksanaan Sistem E-Procurement Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Untuk Mencegah Terjadinya Persekongkolan Tender. Jurnal Universitas Brawijaya.
Arikunto, S. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian; Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. PT Rineka Cipta.
Baesens, B., Vlasselaer, V. Van, & Verbeke, W. (2015). Fraud Analytics using descriptive, predictive, social network techniques; A Guide to Data Science for Fraud Detection. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bagas, S. A. (2018). Implementasi Data Analytics Dalam Audit Laporan Keuangan sebagai Dampak dari Perkembangan Teknologi. Universitas Brawijaya.
Banarescu, A. (2015). Detecting and Preventing Fraud with Data Analytics. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 1827 – 1836.
BPKP. (2015). Manajemen Risiko Organisasi Sektor Publik (1st ed., Vol. 1). Pusdiklatwas BPKP.
CAGI. (2017). Guidelines on Data Analytics (First Edit). Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
Dwi Prabawa, A., & Hadi, H. (2018). Analisis Kedudukan Hukum Panitia Tender dalam Kasus Persekongkolan Tender di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jurnal Privat Law, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v6i2.24762
Faisol, I. A., Tarjo, & Musyarofah, S. (2014). Pengaruh Penerapan E-Procurement Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Di Sektor Publik. JAFFA Oktober, 02(2).
Febrina, R. (2017). Pengadaan secara Elektronik (LPSE) sebagai Usaha Pemerintah dalam Pencegahan Persekongkolan Tender menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999. Melayunesia Law, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.30652/mnl.v1i1.4503
Ferdinand, A. K., DM, S., & Shafira, M. (2020). Penegakan Hukum dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) dan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Cepalo, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v4no2.2006
Fitriani, N. (2021). Wewenang KPPU terhadap Pemberian Sanksi pada Pihak Lain Dalam Kasus Persekongkolan Tender. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v21i1.1241
GarcÃa RodrÃguez, M. J., RodrÃguez-MontequÃn, V., Ballesteros-Pérez, P., Love, P. E. D., & Signor, R. (2022). Collusion detection in public procurement auctions with machine learning algorithms. Automation in Construction, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104047
Gee, S. (2015). Fraud and Fraud Detection_A Data Analytics Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Grover, V., Chiang, R. H. L., Liang, T. P., & Zhang, D. (2018). Creating Strategic Business Value from Big Data Analytics: A Research Framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1451951
Hallikas, J., Immonen, M., & Brax, S. (2021). Digitalizing procurement: the impact of data analytics on supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-05-2020-0201
Horsey, L. L. (2017). Data Analytics for Fraud Prevention and Detection in State Government. ProQuest.
IIA. (2017). Data Analytics; Is it time to take the first step?
Jugulum, R. (2016). Importance of Data Quality for Analytics. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21332-3_2
Kamal, M. (2019). peta risiko fraud Pengadaan. Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 9(2), 139–163.
Kamal, M. (2022, October 23). Ujian Persaingan Sehat Tender. Https://Www.Republika.Id/Posts/33530/Ujian-Persaingan-Sehat-Tender.
Kamal, M., & Elim, J. (2021). The Strategy to Optimize the Role of Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) in Procurement Fraud Risk Management in Industry 4.0. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 7(2), 151–168.
Keintjem, E. B. (2016). Tinjauan Yuridis Praktek Persekongkolan Yang Tidak Sehat Dalam Tender Proyek Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2019. Lex Administratum, 4(4).
Kiwi. (2022, September 21). Polda Kalbar OTT Pejabat LPSE Ketapang, Diduga Bagi-bagi Duit Proyek. Https://Www.Suarapemredkalbar.Com/Read/Ketapang/21092022/Polda-Kalbar-Ott-Pejabat-Lpse-Ketapang-Diduga-Bagi-Bagi-Duit-Proyek.
KPPU. (2022). Pulih, Bangkit, dan Bersaing-Laporan Tahunan KPPU 2021.
Lee, C. S., Cheang, P. Y. S., & Moslehpour, M. (2022). Predictive Analytics in Business Analytics: Decision Tree. Advances in Decision Sciences, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.47654/V26Y2022I1P1-30
LKPP. (2016). Mengelola Risiko, Unit Kompetensi 29, materi SKKNI 2016 (1st ed., Vol. 1).
Ma, C., Chen, Y., & Nie, S. (2022). Four-Way Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government Project Bidding Collusion in a State of Limited Rationality Based on Prospect Theory. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6092802
Made, G. R. P. M. (2021). Kewenangan KPPU Menjatuhkan Sanksi Daftar Hitam dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v5i2.1823
Maheswari, A. A. (2020). Batasan, Wewenang dan Keterlibatan KPPU Dalam Kasus Persekongkolan Tender Menurut Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jurist-Diction, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i5.21967
Manihuruk, S., Budiharto, & Prananingtyas, P. (2016). Tinjauan Yuridis Praktek Persekongkolan Tender Pengadaan Bus Trans Jakarta (Analisis Putusan Kppu No. 15/Kppu-I/2014 Tentang Tender Bus Trans Jakarta). Diponegoro Law Review, 5(2).
Maria, A., & Anggraini, T. (2013). Sinergi Bumn Dalam Pengadaan Barang Dan/Atau Jasa Dalam Perspektif Persaingan Usaha. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 25(3).
Munawir, Z., & Hasibuan, A. L. (2017). Faktor Penyebab Tidak Terbukti Secara Hukum Bentuk dan Indikasi Persekongkolan dalam Tender. Jupiis: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 9(2).
OECD. (2016). Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement.
OECD. (2017). Algorithms and Collusion: Competition policy in the digital age. the OECD Competition Division. https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/Algorithms-and-colllusion-competition-policy-in-the-digital-age.pdf
Oktorialdi. (2019). Arah Kebijakan Strategi National-Transformasi Digital. Seminar Standarization in a Living Concept Society 5.0.
OLAF. (2017). Fraud in Public Procurement A collection of Red Flags and Best Practices.
Phillips, T. B. A., & Lanclos, R. J. (2014). Data Analytics In Procurement Fraud Prevention. In Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California (Issue June). Naval Postgraduate.
principa.co. (2017). The 4 Types of Data Analytics. Www.Principa.Co.Za. https://principa.co.za/the-4-types-of-data-analytics/.
Purwadi, A. (2019). Praktik Persekongkolan Tender Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v2i2.2494
Saputra, R., Suraji, A., & Hakam, A. (2016). Analisis Kegagalan Konstruksi Dari Perspektif Socio – Engineering System. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil (JRS-Unand), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.25077/jrs.12.1.61-70.2016
Sirait, R. A. M. (2020). Larangan Tindakan Persekongkolan Dalam Tender Ber-dasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Tanjungpura Law Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v4i2.33980
Suhermin. (2012). Sistem Informasi Keputusan Tender Proyek Di Kabupaten Bangkalan Menggunakan Accord Model. Sistem Informasi Keputusan Tender Proyek Di Kabupaten Bangkalan Menggunakan Accord Model.
Suradiyanto, S., & Pratiwie, D. W. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Indikasi Persekongkolan Tender Jack Up Drilling Rig Services Antara HUSKY-CNOOC MADURA LIMITED dengan PT COSL INDO (Analisis Putusan KPPU No. 03/KPPU-L/2016). Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v12i1.824.
Suryoprayogo, E. (2022). Keabsahan Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi Yang Terbukti Dibentuk Dari Persekongkolan Tender. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss1.art2.
Ustien, D. O. (2019). Kewenangan KPPU Terhadap Persekongkolan Tender. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora.
Vadász, P., Benczúr, A., Füzesi, G., & Munk, S. (2016). Identifying Illegal Cartel Activities from Open Sources. In B. Akhgar, P. S. Bayerl, & F. Sampson (Eds.), Open Source Intelligence Investigation; From Strategy to Implementation (pp. 251–274). Springer International Publishing AG 2016.
Wibowo, S. (2021). Tender Conspiracy In Electronic Procurement Of Goods And Services (A Study Of Case Number 04/KPPU-L/2015). Prophetic Law Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/plr.vol3.iss1.art4
Wisny, W. (2016). Penerapan Sanksi Administratif Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) Terhadap Pelaku Usaha yang Melakukan Persekongkolan dalam Tender. PALAR: PAKUAN LAW REVIEW, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v2i2.941
Wulan, D. N., Masruroh, A., & Rusydi, R. (2019). Persekongkolan Tender Dalam Persaingan Usaha Menurut Uu No. 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Mimbar Yustitia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v3i2.1959.
