Revealing Fraudulent Practices in Management of Community Group Regional Grant Funding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v9i2.325Keywords:
Fraud, Grant Funds, Community GroupsAbstract
Grant funds are a Provincial Government program that is disbursed to recipients of grant funds, namely community groups, to improve community welfare through infrastructure development such as road asphalting, concrete rebates, retaining walls, and other programs. This research aims to describe fraudulent practices in managing regional grant funds for community groups starting from planning, implementation, and accountability. This research uses descriptive qualitative methods by collecting data through interviews, observation, and documentation. The results of this research found that the fraudulent practice of managing regional grant funds for community groups began when the proposal was ratified, where there was an act of gratification aimed at speeding up the ratification of the grant fund proposal. During the disbursement of grant funds, unreasonable deductions were practiced by community group coordinators. This practice was carried out for the management of community groups starting from submitting proposals to preparing accountability reports. Fictional physical development activities have a strong backing, the aim is to embezzle and profit from the grant budget. Furthermore, grant fund fraud actors colluded with related agencies so that physical construction that did not comply with budget plans escaped supervision.References
Aigwi, E. I., Filippova, O., Ingham, J., & Phipps. (2021). From Drag to Brag: The Role of Government Grants in Enhancing Built Heritage Protection Efforts in New Zealand’s Provincial Regions. Journal of Rural Studies, 87, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.08.024.
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195.
Albrecht, & Zimbelman. (2017). Fraud Examination 4th Edition. Cengage Learning: Mason, Ohio.
Ardhiyanto, M. (2018). Pelaksanaan Dana Hibah Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah Sebagaimana Diubah Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2015. Jurnal USM Law Review, 1(2), 173-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v1i2.2251.
Arif, M., & Nasution, A. S. (2022). The Role of Grants in Infrastructure Development Efforts. Jurnal Emba Review, 2(1), 171-176. https://doi.org/10.53697/emba.v2i1.548.
Barus, B. K., & Nasution, J. (2022). Accountability Analysis of Grants Shopping in The Government of North Sumatera Province. Bilancia: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(4), 327-332. https://doi.org/10.35145/bilancia.v6i4.2087.
Basuki, S. (2006). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Wedatama Widya Sastra.
Chaurey, R., & Le, T. D. (2022). Infrastructure maintenance and rural economic activity: Evidence from India. Journal of Public Economics, 214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104725.
Clark, A. (2017). Impact on Grant Fraud within the Governmen. Economic Crime Forensics Capstones, 17, 1-15.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Belajar.
Crowe, H. (2011). Why The Fraud Triangle Is No Longer Enough. Crowe LLP.
Damayanti, I. (2018). Pemberian Hibah Berdasarkan Peraturan Gubernur Bali Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Pemberian Hibah Dan Bantuan Sosial. Jurnal Hukum Konatriatan, 3(2), 373-385. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i02.p13.
Faisal, A. A. (2018). Pencegahan dan Deteksi Kasus Korupsi Pada Sektor Publik Dengan Fraud Triaangle. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, dan Akuntansi, 20(4), 117. https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v20i4.1238.
Faisol, F., & Alim, M. N. (2024). Analysis of the Fraud Prevention Model at KSPP Syariah BMT NU Torjun Branch. ILTIZAM Journal of Shariah Economics Research, 8(1), 38-49.
Faisol, F., Haryadi, B., Musyarofah, S., & Iswahyudi, A. P. (2023). Effectiveness of the Internal Control System Against Fraud Tendencies “Meta-Analysis Study”. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 8(2), 327-339.
Goffin, K., Ahlström, P., Bianchi, M., & Richtnér. (2019). Perspective: State-oftheArt: The Quality of Case Study Research in Innovation Management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(5), 586-615). https://doi.org/10.1111/ jpim.12492.
Haliim, W. (2020). Problematika Kebijakan Dana Hibah dan Bantuan Sosial Sumber APBD: Relasi Korupsi Terhadap Kekuasaan Kepemimpinan, dan Perilaku Elit. Jurnal Politik dan Kebijakan, 17(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.33626/inovasi.v17i1.136.
Harahap, H. R. (2019). Implementasi Dana Hibah dan Bansos Berdasarkan Permendagri Nomor 39 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Pemberian Hibah dan Bantuan Sosial yang Bersumber dari APBD Terhadap Transparansi Penyerapan Anggaran Hibah dan Bantuan Sosial di Kota Pontianak. Maksi Untan, 4(1), 1-22.
Indrijantoro, W., Irwansyah, I., Hernand, A. R., & Sukeri, B. (2023). Implementation of Grant Management Policy and Social Assistance for the City of Bekasi. Asian Journal of Applied Business and Management, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajabm.v2i1.2826.
Iswahyudi, A. P., Faisol, F., Akbar, M., Wati, S., & Munawaroh, S. (2023). Effectiveness of Risk Management on a Company’s Financial Performance: Study of Meta Analysis. Journal of Business Management and Economic Development, 1(2), 366-378.
Jumadin, Z., & Wibisono, Y. (2019). Konflik Politik Antara Gubernur dan DPRD DKI Jakarta dalam Proses Penetapan APBD 2015. Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 4(2), 249-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.47313/pjsh.v4i2.698.
Kamayanti, A. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi. Pengantar Religio-sitas Keilmuan. Penerbit Peneleh.
Kopung, S., Mayer, J., Lubbe, S., & Klopper, R. (2016). Operational framework for municipal infrastructure grant spending in the North-West. Journal of Public Administration, 51(1), 53-65.
KPK. (2022). Kasus Korupsi Dana Hibah Pokmas Yang Dilakukan Wakil Ketua DPRD Jawa Timur. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/.
Labola, M. (2017). Menutup Celah Korupsi Pemerintahan Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 43(2), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.33701/jipwp.v43i2.50.
Lathifah, N., & Yudha, R. A. (2018). Rancangan Database E-Budgeting: Upaya Pengendalian Dana Hibah Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur. Seminar Nasional dan Call for Paper: Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Perbankkan, 1(1), 1210-1233.
Lestari, G. K., Arthanaya, W., & Suryani, P. L. (2019). Pemberian Hibah Pemerintah Provinsi Bali Kepada Desa Pakraman. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 1(2), 259-264. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.1.2.1747.259-264.
Madiarsih, C. N., Widiawati, D., & Hartanto, D. A. (2020). Analisis Efektivitas Program Hibah Pokmas terhadap Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 3(2), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.33005/jdep.v3i2.110.
Makalalag, U. S., Sukoharsono, G. E., & Djamhuri. (2020). Kearifan Lokal Sebagai Simbol daam Keputusan Kebijakan Penganggaran Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(2), 355-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2020.11.2.21.
Massaro, M. D., & Bagnoli, C. (2009). Transparency and the Rhetorical Use of Citations to Robert Yin in Case Study Research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(1), 44-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2017-0202.
Mokgethi, M. D., & Waldt, V. G. (2020). The Application of Project Management Methodology for Municipal Infrastructure Grant Projects. Administratio Publica, 28(4), 126-144.
Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ngene, A., Sir, S. R., & Rantelobo, T. A. (2021). Analisis Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Dana Bantuan Sosial yang Bersumber dari Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah di Kabupaten Ngada. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan dan Audit, 6(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.32511/jaka.v2i1.261.
Olufemi, A., & Adekemi, O. (2021). The Impact of Fraudulent Practices on Infrastructural Development in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 12(6), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.7176/JESD/12-608.
Pengadilan Tipikor Surabaya. (2017). Bendahara Pokmas Majapahit Divonis 1 Tahun Penjara. Surabaya: http://sipp.pnsurabayakota.go.id/list_perkara/search_detail.
Pengadilan Tipikor Surabaya. (2021). Kasus Korupsi Dana Hibah Daerah Kelompok Masyarakat di Kabupaten Blitar. Surbaya: http://sipp.pnsurabayakota.go.id/list_perkara/search_detail.
Peraturan Gubernur Jawa Timur Nomor 134 Tahun 2018 tentang Tata Cara Penganggaran, Pelaksanaan, Pelaporan dan Pertanggungjawaban Dana Hibah.
Pradana, A. H. (2020). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Pemberian Dana Hibah. 3(1), 153-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i1.17629.
Prasetya, D., Yudharta, I., & Dwi, W. K. (2020). Akuntabilitas Sektor Publik Pemerintah Kabupaten Badung dalam Pemberian Hibah Kelompok atau Masyarakat Tahun 2018. Citizen Charter Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1(1), 1-14.
Ridder, H. (2017). The Theory Contribution of Case Study Research Designs. Business Research, 10(2), 281-305 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-0170045-z.
Runtuwarouw, Y. M., Liat, V., & Lambey, L. (2019). Analisa Akuntabilitas Belanja Hibah pada Pemerintah Kota Manado. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing, 10(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.35800/jjs.v10i2.24976.
Sadikin, S., Hannan, S., & Sunani, U. (2021). Peran Pemerintah Daerah dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur Jalan untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat di Kecamatan Ulu-manda. Journal Peqguruang: Conference Series, 3(2), 835-839. https://dx.doi.org/10.35329/jp.v3i2.2215.
Sasono, E. M., & Rohman, A. M. (2022). Risk Analysis of Community-Based Infrastructure Grant Program. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2020i3.11077.
Satibi, I. (2011). Teknik Penulisian Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi. Ceplas.
Setiawan, A. R., Irianto, G., & Achsin, M. (2013). System-Driven (Un) Fraud: Tafsir Aparatur Terhadap “Sisi Gelap” Pengelolaan Ke-uangan Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 4(1), 85–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2013.04.7184.
Setiawan, D., & Setyorini, E. (2018). Dampak Pemilihan Kepala Daerah terhadap Alokasi Belanja Daerah. Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 2(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v2i2.365.
Sianturi, H. (2017). Kedudukan Keuangan Daerah dalam Pengelolaan Dana Hibah dan Bantuan Sosial Ber-dasarkan Perspektif Keuangan Negara. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 1(1), 86-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v1i1.129
Srhoj, S., Lapinski, M., & Walde, J. (2021). Impact Evaluation of Business Development Grants on SME Performance. Small Business Economics, 57, 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00348-6.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & R&D. Penerbit CV Alfabeta.
Susandra, F., & Hartina, S. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Fraud pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (SKPD) di Kota Bogor. Jurnal Akunida, 3(2), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.30997/jakd.v2i2.1402.
Syaifullah, A., Tarjo, & Musyarofah, S. (2018). Disclosing The Triggers of Fraud in The Management of Community Group Grant Funds (Case Study at Manut Agency of Hilir Province). Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 3(1), 93-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v3i1.63.
Tuanakotta, T. (2012). Audit Berbasis ISA (International Standards on Auditing. Selemba Empat.
Tuanakotta, T. (2018). Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigatif. Selemba Empat.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Utami, R. I., Resen, S. M., & Dahana, D. C. (2019). Implementasi Penyaluran Dana Hibah Kepada Kelompok Masyarakat di Kabupaten Badung Tahun Anggaran 2017. Jurnal Kertha Negara, 7(4), 1-15.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). “Advancing Theory of Fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. Model”. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372-381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-122017-0128.
Wolfe, T. D., & Hermanson, R. D. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering The Four Element of Fraud. Digitalcommons, 12, 1-5.
Yin, R. K. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta .
Zulaikha, & Hadiprajitno, B. P. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Procurement Fraud: Sebuah Kajian dari Perspektif Persepsian Auditor Eksternal. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(2), 194-220. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2016.11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Faisol Faisol
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.